Archive for the ‘Rawstory’ Category

re “Bush signed India nuclear deal with disappearing ink”

December 19, 2006

“Bush signing statement on US-India nuclear deal erases Congressional restrictions”

See Michael Roston at Raw Story
Published: Tuesday December 19, 2006

Chris Kelley, a political science professor at Miami University of Ohio who has studied presidential signing statements closely, remarked on his personal blog last night that “All of the attention that the signing received was directed precisely where the administration wanted, and away from the sections of the bill that the President has undermined.”

In a seeming echo of Bush’s statement, Reuters reported India’s Prime Minister Manmohan Singh as responding to domestic critics of the agreement that “India would not be bound by “extraneous” conditions attached to the deal when it was passed by the U.S. Congress this month, rejecting efforts to constrain New Delhi’s policy towards Iran or its own nuclear weapons programme.”

Bush’s presidential signing statement can be accessed in full at the White House website. The sections of the legislation affected by the presidential signing statement are included at this link.


The following hypothesis and speculation may explain why India gets away with this.

India may have kompromat on Bush. From the 1920’s, Russia has had plagiarism files on US profs. These may have been used to get IMF loans in the 1990’s for Russia from Clinton profs. Bush neocon profs may have known that and used that for the Iraq Liberation Act in 1998 and during Bush v. Gore.

The USAO Mass investigated the Harvard econ dept on a grant to Russia starting in 1997. That investigation lasted to Aug 2005. During that time, the Clinton profs and then Bush team may have concealed the above info from it.

India has known of this scheme in physics for over 50 years and the econ incidents as well most likely. The PM of India, Manmohan Singh, appears to have been a sort of operative for India in the econ sphere.

Shaukat Aziz is his corresponding part at Pakistan and is PM and foreign minister of Pakistan and comes from Citigroup.

India and Pakistan have been using this history as leverage since their 1998 nuclear tests. Pakistan got to support terrorism starting with the Aug 98 embassy bombings and continuing through 9-11 to the present support of the Taliban.

India is now getting paid off with US nuclear technology and the right to buy more fuel. The reason there are no real limits on India is because Singh has this on Bush.

Russia’s Plagiarism Files

The above is speculation.


Rawstory Comments October 2006

December 16, 2006

October 5th, 2006 at 05:14:12
Russia, India, China worst for bribery

Iran: Sanctions won’t derail enrichment

“Nato’s top brass: Pakistan aids Taliban”

October 7th, 2006 at 17:49:33

October 8th, 2006 at 13:35:49 From: Fallaci Admirer
The whole govt is afraid of the Bush team
There is a vast amount of info known about the Bush team. This includes in staff of DOJ perhaps.

October 8th, 2006 at 16:11:21 From: Fallacie Admirer
Reply to Gandhi
NATO is in Afghanistan to protect the West. Pakistan is intentionally undermining it by training the Taliban and supporting them with funds from Saudi Arabia that they take a cut of. Iran is supporting international terrorism and developing nukes. Pakistan developed its nuke in May 98 and then attacked India in 99 and in effect has attacked us through the Tablian and al Qaeda in Aug 98 embassies, 2000 Cole, 2001 WTC and Pentagon. Saudis are funding this. We have to go to the two sources Pakistan and Saudi Arabia or we will lose. They will fund and support rebels against us in Afghanistan and Iraq forever. Iran is part of this combination and it sees that like Pakistan, once it gets nukes, it can go on the offensive. So we need to attack them now when battle phase deaths are 200 v. occupation deaths per month in Iraq are 70. Deaths in Iran may be higher than in Iraq for the battle phase, but we are bleeding in Iraq and Afghanistan while our main opponents sit back in Pakistan, Iran and Saudi Arabia without being touched.

October 23rd, 2006 at 11:14:53 From: Fallaci Admirer
re johns
Jack Straw may not be eaten by snakes but he is getting hissed at for asking Muslim women to take their veils off. But being thrown to crocs by new Britons may be next for him if he keeps immigration going strong.


October 23rd, 2006 at 11:16:39 From: Fallaci Admirer
Musharraf knew better
Mush didn’t go on the Colbert report but instead the Daily Show, where he was treated with the same respect dictators who kill Americans get at the White House, a plug for his book.


October 23rd, 2006 at 12:07:44 From: Fallaci Admirer
Sibel has my vote
Hastert should go. Hastert needs to testify. Mostly about everything he knows about the Clinton and Bush administrations and people in all 3 branches of govt at high levels.


October 23rd, 2006 at 17:55:33 From: Fallaci Admirer
Iraq 200 Battle Phase Deaths 70/mo occupation
We lose 70 deaths a month occupying Iraq. The two main drivers of occupation deaths are foreign Sunni Arab fighters that Iranians won’t take in and the historical Shiite Sunni struggle in Iraq for control. These won’t be present in Iran. Invading Iran will help the struggle in Iraq. Thus by leaving Iraq and invading Iran we help Iraq at lower cost. If Iraq gets very bad while we are gone, we can always swing through it later. But in Iran we position our army on the Pakistan border to denuke and deLaden Pakistan.


October 23rd, 2006 at 11:11:15 From: Fallaci Admirer
New Deal = Old Deal Kill Americans
This has been the Pakistan ISI and Taliban deal since 1993/94 when the ISI created the Taliban. The deal is that Pakistan and the Taliban join forces to kill Americans and Brits everywhere in the world. Oh and also Hindus, Jews, French, Spanish, etc.

God Bless Internet Trolls

Harvard paper suspends ‘plagiarists’

Is McCain as ’08 GOP nominee inevitable?

December 16, 2006

December 16th, 2006 at 09:09:39 From: Fallaci Admirer
Tom Tancredo: Stop Immigration and Iran
Tancredo is the man to stand in the way of the onward march of immigration and Islam.

December 16th, 2006 at 11:33:33 From: Fallaci Admirer
Why do you say Tancredo is a FOOL?
Besides, aren’t all politicians? Its a question of which foolishness harms us the most. Men’s median wages are lower than in 1973 because of immigration. Bush is stuck in Iraq and he lets NoKo, Pakistan and Iran keep advancing on their nuclear, sub and missile programs. McCain says me too. Bring them here so they can use their Bush nukes here is what they push.
December 16th, 2006 at 17:35:06 From: Fallaci Admirer
Reply to Franklin Spinning in his grave from above 3:00:38

From: franklin’s spinning in his grave “To Fellatio Admission: Why do you neoconmen keep advocating 21st Crusades?”

Answer: They have nukes already in Pakistan, and subs and missiles, which they will combine and have off our coasts. Battle phase deaths in Iraq were 200. Invade Iran now and remove its subs, missiles and nuke developments while we have based on all 3 sides of it.

We paid 3000 occupation lives, now use them to save lives in invading Iran. That leaves us in position to surround Pakistan and blockade it to give up its nukes, missiles and subs instead of combine them and sell them to Saudi Arabia.
December 16th, 2006 at 17:36:21 From: Fallaci Admirer
Continuation of Reply

You people claim we have to give up our rights because we have to fight the “Islamofascists”.

Answer: Bush claims this. I say end all immigration. We don’t have to give up our rights here if we don’t let them come here. They can’t kill us here if they can’t come here. I oppose all torture, etc.
December 16th, 2006 at 17:38:13 From: Fallaci Admirer
Continuation of Reply

What difference does it make if we’re “Christofascists” and fighting “Islamofascist”?

Answer: They are coming here to kill us. They attacked us from the inside. Their history from 622 AD to present is genocide of Christians and Jews. There has been no century since 622 AD they have not been attacking us, enslaving us, genociding us, taking us hostage for ransom, etc. The Koran was written in 656 AD after they attacked in 633 AD.
December 16th, 2006 at 17:40:14 From: Fallaci Admirer
Continuation of Reply

One is just as bad as the other. This is just another sad chapter in human history with “who has the right religion” and culture.

Answer: Their religion doesn’t damp down or moderate from 622 AD to now. Genocide of Christians was going on in 1890’s, 1900 to 1910, 1910 to 1920, etc. Its going on now in Lebanon. Bethlehem and West Bank Christians were subject to it in the last 40 years.
December 16th, 2006 at 17:42:58 From: Fallaci Admirer

“Screw all of you assholes.”

That is what they are doing. They attacked the Eastern Roman Empire in 633 AD, which was Christian and Jewish. They never sent missionaries. How they say the Koran was written.

They say that they took a pause in battles to kill Christians and Jews to write down the Koran in 654 AD to 656 AD before the Muslims who knew it died from their own self-initiated battles agaist Christians and Jews.

That’s their own account of the Koran: It was written down in a pause they initiated in killing Christians and Jews so that their people could tell the sayings of Muhammed. Then they went back to battles they started to kill Christians and Jews in accordance with the Koran they just took a pause to write down. That’s what they say is the origin of the Koran.

The Koran freezes permanently their battle lust, according to their own account. It commands what they did from 633 AD to 656 AD, were doing then, and wanted the option to do in the continuation of their battle. That’s frozen.

That’s why they get so angry when the Koran is criticized or ridiculed, because the Koran freezes in time the war propaganda of 656 AD against Christians, Jews and the West.

December 16th, 2006 at 19:45:13 From: Fallaci Admirer
V excellent analogy
Powell would want to do Nest Building, reparations and apology, all of which would be lost on the hornets, except to attack now.
December 16th, 2006 at 19:47:12 From: Fallaci Admirer
18:19:49 I agree

“…if we don’t allow them to come over here, and have tight control on the borders, how the hell are they going to get over here?”

Exactly. Also Robert Putnam of Harvard has done a study proving that” “racism here is getting worse. I think that has a lot to do with the excessive illegal and even legal immigration going on in the last ten years or so.” Putnam proved that diversity causes distrust to go up, even within groups.
December 16th, 2006 at 19:48:55 From: Fallaci Admirer

reply to 19:08:31 Athens, Sparta, Syracuse

There is no Macedon or even Rome to rescue us from our mistakes. There is no net. What is coming against us wants us gone forever. We have to wake up and stop it coming. Stop immigration and keep it from having nukes.
December 16th, 2006 at 21:10:10 From: Fallaci Admirer
reply to for the common good

“are you so sure of our military that we’ll survive the consequences of our actions? Will we kill more of them than us? Who survive to write the next batch of history books?”

We need to rebuild the military. We need to add 1 million men. That will cost approximately 120 billion dollars per year. We can still deal with Iran, although we face risks to our ships at sea unlike Iraq, which is one reason we need a ground invasion. A ground invasion component might cost 200 to 2000 killed. But the loss of a few large ships could be much higher than this. Thus the ground phase, by securing their missiles, sub bases, etc. actually reduces the risk of large losses to us. It also contains ongoing risk. As to Pakistan, the time is now to get them to denuke, not down the road. North Korea is something we have to make a decision on now to strike. That would delay an Iran invasion. If we built up our military by 1 million more, we would find it easier to negotiate arms control. We should try to split Russia off from China. Pay Russia to invade North Korea. Japan could pay them. North Korea’s leader may have already decided to use nuclear weapons once he can take down Japan, South Korea, China, Russia and some US sites. He wants to be famous in history as someone who defeated all the great nuclear powers and Japan and SoKo all at once. Others think like him as well, e.g. Iran. As V pointed out, we see distrust build before our eyes. This could be the Year of Distrust.

From V December 16th, 2006 at 21:34:26:

“McCain is one of those who tells Americans how worthless they are. But he speaks of himself and projects it onto the American people.”

Discussion below: