Bush slept through Saddam’s hanging

December 30, 2006

Bush slept through the Aug 6, 2001 PDB briefing, bin Laden determined to attack in the United States.

Bush slept through the Skeptics Annotated Quran class, that the Quran is bigoted and the Verse of the Sword 9:5, slay them where you can find them, commanded 9-11.

Bush slept through the complicity of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia in 9-11.

Bush slept through NoKo getting nukes.

Bush slept through Pakistan developing a new nuclear reactor to produce smaller warheads that can go on sub missiles for its subs from its sub shipyard that France built.

Bush slept through China getting our night vision to supply to insurgents to kill and maim our troops.

LA Times Bush Statement
This article represents hypotheses, speculation or opinion. All other disclaimers apply.


BNP Guaridan Ian Cobain Inside Elite-Liberal Hate

December 22, 2006

Guardian has zero tolerance for truth, about immigration, about Islam, about the source of crime, and who is ultimately responsible. The Guardian, like all the liberal elites, hate their victims for the harm they have done them, those who tell the truth, and most of all those who want to stop it getting worse, who the Guardian hates as the ultimate truth tellers.

The ultimate truth about immigration is told by stopping it. That’s why the Guardian and the Leftist elites won’t allow any discussion of stopping it. To stop it is to admit it was wrong all along. Stopping it is to admit that those who say they are for the working class, have always been against them.

This is why the 9-11 Commission disliked the 9-11 Families. The 9-11 Commission members had kept immigration going after the WTC 1993 attacks. They let in the 19 hijackers after 1993. They were responsible for 9-11.

Then after 9-11, to cover it up, they kept immigration going. That is the truth they don’t want to tell. That is why they dislike the 9-11 Families. That is why they dislike those who tell the truth about 9-11 and immigration.

Bush’s religion of peace speech was pre-emptive attacking of the victims, their families, the survivors, and most of all those who would champion them by telling the simple truth, the 19 hijackers should never have been in the country in the first place.


“Inside the BNP: papers and tapes reveal election strategy”

“Leadership orders image clean-up as vital first step in delivering electoral success”

Ian Cobain
Friday December 22, 2006
The Guardian

Skeptics Annotated Quran

This article is opinion, hypotheses, or speculation. It is draft and preliminary. All other disclaimers apply.

Paul Begala waylays Bay Buchanan, Virgil Goode, and 9-11 Truth

December 22, 2006

Begala Bay Buchanan CNN Transcript

PAUL BEGALA, CNN POLITICAL ANALYST: You know, well, first, just call a spade a spade. Virgil Goode is a bigot and he’s an idiot. Let’s hope he clears that up when he has his press conference, because lots of people misspeak.
The real hate is Begala towards Virgil Goode for telling the truth. Begala was part of the Clinton administration that deliberately attacked Pat Buchanan for saying in 1992 (and in 1996) to restrict immigration as a re-election ploy. This was before and after the WTC 1993 attacks.

The Clinton team cynically chose to risk American lives in order to attack Pat to get re-elected. Begala was part of that political team with Carville in 1992 that made this choice. On 9-11, that risk taking resulted in almost 3000 people being killed.

Begala can’t call the 9-11 Families bigots, he knows that. But he can call Virgil Goode a bigot. Virgil Goode is a spokesperson for the 9-11 Families who do think immigration should have been restricted after 9-11 and really WTC 1993.

Begala was in the Clinton administration during the WTC Feb 26, 1993 attack. He knew that day that Pat Buchanan had been right in his 1992 speech to call for immigration restriction and that Begala had endangered the country by calling Buchanan a bigot. Rather than apologize then and stop immigration, Begala kept silent.

Begala’s real hate is for his victims, the 9-11 Families, and those who died. Begala knows he can’t vent his real hate on the dead or their widows and orphans, but he can vent his hate on those who champion the cause of the 9-11 Families, Virgil Goode.

Begala deliberately did this to Pat Buchanan’s sister, Bay Buchanan so that she couldn’t tell the above truth, which is true on Begala.

==Now they question Bay Buchanan

BLITZER: Let me read once again for you, Bay, and for our viewers precisely what is in this letter that he wrote: “If American citizens don’t wake up and adopt the Virgil Goode position on immigration, there will likely be many more Muslims elected to office and demanding the use of the Koran.”

(You have to see the video to see how she was put on the spot throughout this question and the subsequent discussion.)

BAY BUCHANAN, CNN POLITICAL ANALYST: I can understand what he is trying to say. I think that his choice of words were outrageous. I think it’s a clear mistake that he made, to suggest that we should be worried that Keith Ellison is a — happens to be a Muslim, and is elected now to the Congress, wants to use a Koran.

I don’t see any problem with any of the above, none whatsoever. I think what he — what he is trying to say, which I think is a legitimate point, is that, as a nation, we should get control of our immigration laws, and make certain we have a national debate as to what is our best interests as to who is coming and who we are inviting into this country.

And that is a legitimate national debate, not what we’re doing today. But I think this is something not quite that. And I think this is a mistake.

== end of Bay Buchanan quote

Begala and Blitzer both knew this history. They both were there in 1992 when the Democrats and the MSM attacked Pat Buchanan after Buchanan’s key note speech at the RNC convention.

After Virgil Goode they go on to Sandy Berger, a Clinton administration member who took documents out of the National Archive and tried to destroy them. He hid some under a trailer near the National Archives on a break, and then came back and retrieved them later. This was during his testimony to the 9-11 Commission.

Begala pre-emptively attacked Bay Buchanan before the Berger segment so that she couldn’t hold Begala and the Clinton team responsible for letting in the 19 hijackers as immigrants between Pat Buchanan saying stop immigration in 1996 and 9-11.

More on Begala and Bay Buchanan

This article represents opinion, hypotheses, and speculation. It is draft and preliminary. All other disclaimers apply.

re “Bush signed India nuclear deal with disappearing ink”

December 19, 2006

“Bush signing statement on US-India nuclear deal erases Congressional restrictions”

See Michael Roston at Raw Story
Published: Tuesday December 19, 2006

Chris Kelley, a political science professor at Miami University of Ohio who has studied presidential signing statements closely, remarked on his personal blog last night that “All of the attention that the signing received was directed precisely where the administration wanted, and away from the sections of the bill that the President has undermined.”

In a seeming echo of Bush’s statement, Reuters reported India’s Prime Minister Manmohan Singh as responding to domestic critics of the agreement that “India would not be bound by “extraneous” conditions attached to the deal when it was passed by the U.S. Congress this month, rejecting efforts to constrain New Delhi’s policy towards Iran or its own nuclear weapons programme.”

Bush’s presidential signing statement can be accessed in full at the White House website. The sections of the legislation affected by the presidential signing statement are included at this link.


The following hypothesis and speculation may explain why India gets away with this.

India may have kompromat on Bush. From the 1920’s, Russia has had plagiarism files on US profs. These may have been used to get IMF loans in the 1990’s for Russia from Clinton profs. Bush neocon profs may have known that and used that for the Iraq Liberation Act in 1998 and during Bush v. Gore.

The USAO Mass investigated the Harvard econ dept on a grant to Russia starting in 1997. That investigation lasted to Aug 2005. During that time, the Clinton profs and then Bush team may have concealed the above info from it.

India has known of this scheme in physics for over 50 years and the econ incidents as well most likely. The PM of India, Manmohan Singh, appears to have been a sort of operative for India in the econ sphere.

Shaukat Aziz is his corresponding part at Pakistan and is PM and foreign minister of Pakistan and comes from Citigroup.

India and Pakistan have been using this history as leverage since their 1998 nuclear tests. Pakistan got to support terrorism starting with the Aug 98 embassy bombings and continuing through 9-11 to the present support of the Taliban.

India is now getting paid off with US nuclear technology and the right to buy more fuel. The reason there are no real limits on India is because Singh has this on Bush.

Russia’s Plagiarism Files

The above is speculation.

re North Korea to US: End ‘hostilities’

December 17, 2006

December 17th, 2006 at 08:24:31      From: Fallaci Admirer
Japan should pay Russia to invade North Korea
This could be a 50 billion dollar payment in hard currency. This would also get China to pay attention to Russia again.

The deal could include sanctuary in Japan for Russian leaders who might be involved in the Litinvinko case or older things like IMF loans in the 1990’s.

This could be a good retirement dea for Putin.  Also you don’t want your retirement home to be bombed by North Korea later.

There could even be a special bonus thrown in, take away IMF derived wealth from oligarchs in the West.

North Korea’s Kim Jong Il may have already decided to use nukes on Japan, China, Russia, South Korea and the US. He may want to go out in a blaze of glory.

Rawstory Comments October 2006

December 16, 2006

October 5th, 2006 at 05:14:12
Russia, India, China worst for bribery

Iran: Sanctions won’t derail enrichment


“Nato’s top brass: Pakistan aids Taliban”

October 7th, 2006 at 17:49:33




October 8th, 2006 at 13:35:49 From: Fallaci Admirer
The whole govt is afraid of the Bush team
There is a vast amount of info known about the Bush team. This includes in staff of DOJ perhaps.


October 8th, 2006 at 16:11:21 From: Fallacie Admirer
Reply to Gandhi
NATO is in Afghanistan to protect the West. Pakistan is intentionally undermining it by training the Taliban and supporting them with funds from Saudi Arabia that they take a cut of. Iran is supporting international terrorism and developing nukes. Pakistan developed its nuke in May 98 and then attacked India in 99 and in effect has attacked us through the Tablian and al Qaeda in Aug 98 embassies, 2000 Cole, 2001 WTC and Pentagon. Saudis are funding this. We have to go to the two sources Pakistan and Saudi Arabia or we will lose. They will fund and support rebels against us in Afghanistan and Iraq forever. Iran is part of this combination and it sees that like Pakistan, once it gets nukes, it can go on the offensive. So we need to attack them now when battle phase deaths are 200 v. occupation deaths per month in Iraq are 70. Deaths in Iran may be higher than in Iraq for the battle phase, but we are bleeding in Iraq and Afghanistan while our main opponents sit back in Pakistan, Iran and Saudi Arabia without being touched.




October 23rd, 2006 at 11:14:53 From: Fallaci Admirer
re johns
Jack Straw may not be eaten by snakes but he is getting hissed at for asking Muslim women to take their veils off. But being thrown to crocs by new Britons may be next for him if he keeps immigration going strong.



October 23rd, 2006 at 11:16:39 From: Fallaci Admirer
Musharraf knew better
Mush didn’t go on the Colbert report but instead the Daily Show, where he was treated with the same respect dictators who kill Americans get at the White House, a plug for his book.



October 23rd, 2006 at 12:07:44 From: Fallaci Admirer
Sibel has my vote
Hastert should go. Hastert needs to testify. Mostly about everything he knows about the Clinton and Bush administrations and people in all 3 branches of govt at high levels.



October 23rd, 2006 at 17:55:33 From: Fallaci Admirer
Iraq 200 Battle Phase Deaths 70/mo occupation
We lose 70 deaths a month occupying Iraq. The two main drivers of occupation deaths are foreign Sunni Arab fighters that Iranians won’t take in and the historical Shiite Sunni struggle in Iraq for control. These won’t be present in Iran. Invading Iran will help the struggle in Iraq. Thus by leaving Iraq and invading Iran we help Iraq at lower cost. If Iraq gets very bad while we are gone, we can always swing through it later. But in Iran we position our army on the Pakistan border to denuke and deLaden Pakistan.



October 23rd, 2006 at 11:11:15 From: Fallaci Admirer
New Deal = Old Deal Kill Americans
This has been the Pakistan ISI and Taliban deal since 1993/94 when the ISI created the Taliban. The deal is that Pakistan and the Taliban join forces to kill Americans and Brits everywhere in the world. Oh and also Hindus, Jews, French, Spanish, etc.


God Bless Internet Trolls








Harvard paper suspends ‘plagiarists’



Is McCain as ’08 GOP nominee inevitable?

December 16, 2006


December 16th, 2006 at 09:09:39 From: Fallaci Admirer
Tom Tancredo: Stop Immigration and Iran
Tancredo is the man to stand in the way of the onward march of immigration and Islam.

December 16th, 2006 at 11:33:33 From: Fallaci Admirer
Why do you say Tancredo is a FOOL?
Besides, aren’t all politicians? Its a question of which foolishness harms us the most. Men’s median wages are lower than in 1973 because of immigration. Bush is stuck in Iraq and he lets NoKo, Pakistan and Iran keep advancing on their nuclear, sub and missile programs. McCain says me too. Bring them here so they can use their Bush nukes here is what they push.
December 16th, 2006 at 17:35:06 From: Fallaci Admirer
Reply to Franklin Spinning in his grave from above 3:00:38

From: franklin’s spinning in his grave “To Fellatio Admission: Why do you neoconmen keep advocating 21st Crusades?”

Answer: They have nukes already in Pakistan, and subs and missiles, which they will combine and have off our coasts. Battle phase deaths in Iraq were 200. Invade Iran now and remove its subs, missiles and nuke developments while we have based on all 3 sides of it.

We paid 3000 occupation lives, now use them to save lives in invading Iran. That leaves us in position to surround Pakistan and blockade it to give up its nukes, missiles and subs instead of combine them and sell them to Saudi Arabia.
December 16th, 2006 at 17:36:21 From: Fallaci Admirer
Continuation of Reply

You people claim we have to give up our rights because we have to fight the “Islamofascists”.

Answer: Bush claims this. I say end all immigration. We don’t have to give up our rights here if we don’t let them come here. They can’t kill us here if they can’t come here. I oppose all torture, etc.
December 16th, 2006 at 17:38:13 From: Fallaci Admirer
Continuation of Reply

What difference does it make if we’re “Christofascists” and fighting “Islamofascist”?

Answer: They are coming here to kill us. They attacked us from the inside. Their history from 622 AD to present is genocide of Christians and Jews. There has been no century since 622 AD they have not been attacking us, enslaving us, genociding us, taking us hostage for ransom, etc. The Koran was written in 656 AD after they attacked in 633 AD.
December 16th, 2006 at 17:40:14 From: Fallaci Admirer
Continuation of Reply

One is just as bad as the other. This is just another sad chapter in human history with “who has the right religion” and culture.

Answer: Their religion doesn’t damp down or moderate from 622 AD to now. Genocide of Christians was going on in 1890’s, 1900 to 1910, 1910 to 1920, etc. Its going on now in Lebanon. Bethlehem and West Bank Christians were subject to it in the last 40 years.
December 16th, 2006 at 17:42:58 From: Fallaci Admirer

“Screw all of you assholes.”

That is what they are doing. They attacked the Eastern Roman Empire in 633 AD, which was Christian and Jewish. They never sent missionaries. How they say the Koran was written.

They say that they took a pause in battles to kill Christians and Jews to write down the Koran in 654 AD to 656 AD before the Muslims who knew it died from their own self-initiated battles agaist Christians and Jews.

That’s their own account of the Koran: It was written down in a pause they initiated in killing Christians and Jews so that their people could tell the sayings of Muhammed. Then they went back to battles they started to kill Christians and Jews in accordance with the Koran they just took a pause to write down. That’s what they say is the origin of the Koran.

The Koran freezes permanently their battle lust, according to their own account. It commands what they did from 633 AD to 656 AD, were doing then, and wanted the option to do in the continuation of their battle. That’s frozen.

That’s why they get so angry when the Koran is criticized or ridiculed, because the Koran freezes in time the war propaganda of 656 AD against Christians, Jews and the West.

December 16th, 2006 at 19:45:13 From: Fallaci Admirer
V excellent analogy
Powell would want to do Nest Building, reparations and apology, all of which would be lost on the hornets, except to attack now.
December 16th, 2006 at 19:47:12 From: Fallaci Admirer
18:19:49 I agree

“…if we don’t allow them to come over here, and have tight control on the borders, how the hell are they going to get over here?”

Exactly. Also Robert Putnam of Harvard has done a study proving that” “racism here is getting worse. I think that has a lot to do with the excessive illegal and even legal immigration going on in the last ten years or so.” Putnam proved that diversity causes distrust to go up, even within groups.
December 16th, 2006 at 19:48:55 From: Fallaci Admirer

reply to 19:08:31 Athens, Sparta, Syracuse

There is no Macedon or even Rome to rescue us from our mistakes. There is no net. What is coming against us wants us gone forever. We have to wake up and stop it coming. Stop immigration and keep it from having nukes.
December 16th, 2006 at 21:10:10 From: Fallaci Admirer
reply to for the common good

“are you so sure of our military that we’ll survive the consequences of our actions? Will we kill more of them than us? Who survive to write the next batch of history books?”

We need to rebuild the military. We need to add 1 million men. That will cost approximately 120 billion dollars per year. We can still deal with Iran, although we face risks to our ships at sea unlike Iraq, which is one reason we need a ground invasion. A ground invasion component might cost 200 to 2000 killed. But the loss of a few large ships could be much higher than this. Thus the ground phase, by securing their missiles, sub bases, etc. actually reduces the risk of large losses to us. It also contains ongoing risk. As to Pakistan, the time is now to get them to denuke, not down the road. North Korea is something we have to make a decision on now to strike. That would delay an Iran invasion. If we built up our military by 1 million more, we would find it easier to negotiate arms control. We should try to split Russia off from China. Pay Russia to invade North Korea. Japan could pay them. North Korea’s leader may have already decided to use nuclear weapons once he can take down Japan, South Korea, China, Russia and some US sites. He wants to be famous in history as someone who defeated all the great nuclear powers and Japan and SoKo all at once. Others think like him as well, e.g. Iran. As V pointed out, we see distrust build before our eyes. This could be the Year of Distrust.

From V December 16th, 2006 at 21:34:26:

“McCain is one of those who tells Americans how worthless they are. But he speaks of himself and projects it onto the American people.”

Discussion below:


Russia Plagiarism Files, LTCM, Pakistan etc.

October 30, 2006


October 29th, 2006 at 16:52:03 From: Fallaci Admirer
Pakistan ISI is using Afghanistan on us like on Russia
They are using Afghanistan to defeat America like we tried to use it to defeat the Soviet Union. Same with Iraq. This is their plan. Saudis fund resistance in both places. Solution: Invade Iran, surround Pakistan, blockade it to give up nukes, bin Laden and Taliban. Invade Arabia and make it Multicultural Arabia, majority non Muslim population in Mulitcultural Mecca.

October 29th, 2006 at 17:22:32 From: Fallaci Admirer
To “Pissed”, Army in Iraq can Invade Iran leave Iraq
In WWII we island hopped to the Japanese mainland rather than get bogged down in peripheral conflicts. The same applies here. Its time to Island/Country hop from Iraq to Iran, one of the 3 main homelands of what is attacking us. Its wrong to let our troops die in a peripheral war when we can go to the source.

October 29th, 2006 at 17:41:04 From: Fallaci Admirer
Spy problem in US
“little spies in US they have managed to literally destroy the super power status of US single handed.” Its Russia, China, Pakistan, UAE and Saudi Arabia that have spies in the US who are harming us. Russia got low interest rate loans in the 1990’s while knowing detailed history of Clinton people involved.

Bushco knew some of that history as well and may have used it to get the Iraq Liberation Act or during Bush v. Gore. Pakistan, Saudi and UAE may have guessed what this was by 9-11 and then used that as leverage on Bush so that he didn’t go after them, despite their actions in the 5 years before 9-11, regardless of their specific involvement in 9-11. This is the spy problem we have.

We need to go to the source of Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and UAE no matter what they have on Bush Clinton. This is a hypothesis and speculation.

October 29th, 2006 at 18:03:49 From: Fallaci Admirer
re Pissed and AIPAC
Jane Harmon and AIPAC are both Americans and the issue of who becomes chairwoman of House Intelligence is a domestic political matter. We were attacked on 9-11. In the 5 years since, Pakistan has been implicated in helping the Taliban against US and NATO troops in Afghanistan.

There was a heated discussion between Armitage and General Ahmed of the Pakistan ISI on 9-12 or 9-13. Did Ahmed have info on Armitage and the PNAC group that got the Iraq Liberation Act in 1998 during Clinton impeachment hearings, hearings on loans to Russia, the USAO Mass investigation of Harvard, HIID, Shleifer, Hay, the fed bailout of LTCM, which had Harvard employee(s) in common, etc.

Did Russia have detailed info on Clinton admin that LTCM, Harvard, etc. knew of and may have traded Russian govt bonds on? Was this kept from the USAO Mass starting in 1997 and Congress in 1998? These are questions not assertions.

Did Wolfowitz and Yoo know or suspect? Was that used to get the Iraq Liberation Act in 98 and then during Bush v. Gore? Did Pakistan, UAE, Saudi Arabia use that after 9-11 to keep Bush from going after them? Have Russia and China used that to torpedo the talks with North Korea and Iran?

These are not assertions, but questions and speculation. But this is the real spy issue. Were we attacked on 9-11 or are the Saudis and Pakistan aiding the fight against the US in Pakistan and/or Iraq because they have such info over Bush and Clinton?


October 29th, 2006 at 18:28:52 From: Fallaci Admirer
‘We were attacked on 9-11” by al Qaeda
With possible support or knowledge before or after by Pakistan, UAE and Saudi Arabia. However, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia don’t get a pass for all their acts before and after 9-11 because we don’t have enough public proof for everyone of their complicity before or after.

The London Times has reported that this fall the head of NATO in Afghanistan went to Pakistan to talk about Paksitan support of the Taliban with Saudi funding against NATO troops. The same applies to Saudi funding in Iraq and elsewhere. This then goes back to the issue of whether the Saudis and Pakistan have leverage on Bush. That then goes back to those earlier Clinton era investigations, the USAO Mass investigation of Harvard, HIID, Shleifer, LTCM trading of Russian bonds and the Fed arranged bailout.

This is one where there are bits of circumstantial evidence consistent with Russia have files on issues relating to the profs at Harvard, IMF, US Treasury and LTCM going back decades and including possible attempts to pressure that group for nominations for the 1975 Nobel Prize in economics at an econ conference in Warsaw in 1972. Jacob Wolfowitz, Paul’s father knew of issues back to 1952.

John Yoo may have picked up info at Berkeley law school on this. Scalia had econ Ph.D./J.D. clerks before and after Bush v. Gore. These are questions and hypotheses, not assertions. But this is the real issue, were we attacked before or after 9-11 with Pakistan and Saudi assistance relying on their high level appointees at IMF and World Bank to know this history?

The USAO Mass investigation of Harvard and HIID lasted to August 2005, overlapping the AIPAC and Plame leak investigations. This is the issue for probing. This is hypothesis not assertion.


October 29th, 2006 at 18:36:06 From: Fallaci Admirer
USAO Mass investigation was 1997 to Aug 2005
1995 is a key year, in spring of 1995, the Gorelick Wall Memo said the FBI couldn’t give info to Assistant US Attorneys from NSA wiretaps overseas including foreign profs. Gorelick became a Harvard Overseer in 1998. She hired Summers from US Treasury in 2001 after Bush v. Gore. Daschle appointed her to the 9-11 Commission.Summers was in charge of loans to Russia with Stanley Fischer.

It was Samuelson the uncle of Summers who was involved in the 1969 MIT incidents with Fischer and Robert C. Merton that raise questions, not asserting misconduct here, but which the Russians may have tried to use to pressure nominations for the 1975 Nobel Prize in economics from Arrow and Samuelson, uncles of Summers for Kantorovich of the USSR. Jacob Wolfowitz had a student going to MIT in 1969 and MIT econ prof(s) as prior student(s). These are questions not assertions.


October 29th, 2006 at 18:58:59 From: Fallaci Admirer
re Putin paid debt last August
You are well informed Pissed, or looked this up in the meantime, either way I tip my hat to you.The reason Putin paid the debt was to put it in the past as not being an ongoing issue for the USAO Mass investigation of Harvard, HIID, Shleifer, Hay, etc.

The big IMF loans started in spring of 1995. In the fall of 1995, Boris Berezovsky and the oligarchs got part of Russia’s oil and gas in loans for shares. Berezovsky has a Ph.D. in math at Moscow State University and worked as a manager at the Institute of Control Sciences Academy of Sciences USSR and was the power behind the throne in the Yeltsin admin.

The reason may be Berezovsky knew from this prior work of the 1952 and 1969 academic incidents and others, which linked to the econ profs and which Jacob Wolfowitz also knew of. Berezovsky hatched the plan to pressure Summers and Fischer, under this hypothesis, to pressure them from this old material used at the 1972 Warsaw econ conference, and US profs from that are still at Harvard and other schools.

It worked, Russia got 10 billion in IMF loans in spring 1995. Berezovsky got his pick of Russia’s oil and gas in fall 1995 as his reward it appears and this money was used to fund Yeltsin’s re-election campaign. Berezovsky became Deputy Secretary of the National Security Council of Russia and picked Putin as successor to Yeltsin.

Putin wanted the IMF loans off the books to put this history behind him. If he thought Pakistan, Saudis, etc. were using this as leverage for 9-11 complicity or subsequent support of Afghanistan and Iraq attacks on US troops that is even more reason for him to put this behind him. This is all speculation and hypotheses.


October 30th, 2006 at 09:35:04 From: Fallaci Admirer
re Ron “woefully ignorant of how it works. “
How does the IMF work? Aleksei V. Mozhin (Russian Federation) Andrei Lushin (Russian Federation) http://www.imf.org/external/np/ sec/memdir/eds.htm see russia site:imf.org Wouldn’t Mozhin and Lushin work with Russian intelligence to have files on US econ profs at IMF?

Wouldn’t that include Stanley Fischer and issues relating to his 1969 MIT Ph.D. thesis and the role of Paul Samuelson, Summers’ uncle in the Fischer thesis and NSF papers that duplicated work of a 1966 UCLA thesis? We are neutral here on whether it was actual plagiarism.

But if you search Samuelson Merton 1969 site:harvard.edu, and then Samuelson Merton Hakansson 1969 site:harvard.edu, you’ll find Harvard not crediting the 1966 UCLA thesis. Look at Robert Merton’s Nobel Prize bio, where he says Hakansson was a grad student at the time, i.e. in 1968, when in fact Hakansson’s thesis is 1966.

Merton’s bio was written in 1997, and he knew Hakansson got his Ph.D. in 1966. Fischer credited Merton and Samuelson in his 1989 textbook. Russian profs gather these facts in and relay them to Mozhin at IMF to use on US profs like Fischer.Fischer got his US citizenship through his thesis and papers on it. This is all to be understood as restated as questions and hypotheses, not assertions.

October 30th, 2006 at 09:43:25 From: Fallaci Admirer
Merton wrote bio in ’97 after USAO Mass investigation
started in spring of 1997. In fall, Merton got Nobel Prize.
USAO Mass was investigating Harvard’s investment in Russian govt bonds, but not it appears LTCM’s investment in them. Merton wrote his NP bio in fall 97 after the investigation of Harvard and its Russian investments started. Ayman Hindy and Victor Haghani at LTCM were involved in trading Russian bonds and LTCM bet heavy on them in Aug 98. One book on LTCM says they traded Russian govt bonds as if they had the inside scoop, Lowenstein’s I believe. This is all hypotheses and speculation.

.. Additional Note on Merton October 1997 Nobel Prize

Merton shared in the Nobel Prize for his contributions to the development of the Black Scholes model, sometimes called Black Scholes Merton. This also raises issues of proper credit being given to A. James Boness thesis at University of Chicago Ph.D. in 1964 and the McKean appendix to the Samuelson paper that contains the first appearance of a partial differential equation for an option price.

Poincare said there should be such an equation in 1900 when Bachelier did his thesis under Poincare at University of Paris. Samuelson had a student do a thesis in the 1950’s that duplicated that paper, according to Samuelson without prior knowledge, until Savage sent Samuelson the citation.



1. Russia started keeping plagiarism files in 1925.

2. these were used to get atomic know how, get Klaus Fuchs into Los Alamos and pressure Niels Bohr.

3. The universities covered this up starting in WWII including in 1950 investigation by FBI of Klaus Fuchs and Oppenheimer Security Clearance Hearings.

4. Russia used this kompromat to get nominations from US profs for Nobel Prizes in physics and econ from 1950’s to present.

5. The same group of profs was pressured at the 1972 Warsaw conference for econ as controlled IMF loans to Russia in the 1990’s, which came to include Larry Summers and Stanley Fischer.

6. LTCM and others traded Russian govt bonds in the 1990’s knowing Russia had this pressure.

7. USAO Mass investigated Harvard econ from 1997 to 2005, but they were deceived. Congress investigated loans to Russia, LTCM bailout but Fed, DOJ HQ, Treasury, etc deceived it.

8. Paul Wolfowitz and Yoo knew this, used it get Iraq Liberation Act and during Bush v. Gore.

9. India and Pakistan knew it in 1998 and used it to do their nuclear tests.

10. Pakistan, Saudis, UAE knew it on 9-11 and used it to continue supporting terrorism in last 5 years even if not involved in 9-11.

11. Russia and China have used it for CFIUS approvals, and to undermine Iran and NoKo negotiations. Russia sold arms to Syria and Iran in 2005 after Israel hired Stanley Fischer as central banker.
12. Bushco are caught in having used this.

13. The Democrats can’t investigate Bush if they control Congress and reveal all, because it leads back to Clinton admin.

14. Marc Rich pardon was because Rich knew this and he got Israel’s support for Rich pardon, Libby his lawyer, because he gave them info on Swiss links.

15. Libby and co have withheld this from Fitzgerald investigation.

16. Russia, China, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan have Bush by the nose because of this, and the Democrats can’t expose because they are in it.

17. Supreme Court, DOJ HQ, Senate Judiciary — Hatch, law school profs, clerks, etc. all linked in.


Russia site:IMF.org



Samuelson Merton Hakansson 1969 site:harvard.edu

0 hits Monday October 30, 2006

Samuelson Merton 1969 site:harvard.edu

15 hits

Samuelson Merton 1969

46,600 hits

Samuelson Merton Hakansson 1969

359 hits

The Role of Learning in Dynamic Portfolio Decisions – Brennan (1997) ” states
Thus, the basic single period theory was extended by Hakansson (1970) Merton (1971) Samuelson (1969), Breeden (1979) and others to allow for a multi period horizon in which investment opportunities might either be constant, time dependent, or even stochastic 4 in the latter case, “


Above is all speculation and hypotheses, and should be restated as questions.

“Nigerian leaders ‘stole’ $380 billion”

October 22, 2006

“Nigerian leaders ‘stole’ $380 billion”

BBC News

“More than $380bn has either been stolen or wasted by Nigerian governments since independence in 1960, the chief corruption fighter has said.

Nuhu Ribadu told the BBC that Nigeria has “nothing much” to show for the missing money. “

October 20th, 2006 at 16:03:27



October 20th, 2006 at 16:44:14 From: Fallaci Admirer
IMF World Bank corruption part of this
The IMF and World Bank themselves are corrupt. Russia has extensive files on US profs who are at the top of the IMF and World Bank and US Treasury, fed, Antitrust Division, judges, etc. From the very beginning this was true. Harry Dexter White was a Soviet spy in WWII and was part of setting up the IMF. Nigeria has likely known of this for decades and used that as a way to get away with this. This is a hypothesis and speculation.

This post represents opinion, hypotheses, and speculation. All other disclaimers apply.

“Nato’s top brass accuse Pakistan over Taliban aid”

October 21, 2006

The Telegraph

Nato’s top brass accuse Pakistan over Taliban aid

By Ahmed Rashid in Kabul
(Filed: 06/10/2006)

“Commanders from five Nato countries whose troops have just fought the bloodiest battle with the Taliban in five years, are demanding their governments get tough with Pakistan over the support and sanctuary its security services provide to the Taliban.

Nato’s report on Operation Medusa, an intense battle that lasted from September 4-17 in the Panjwai district, demonstrates the extent of the Taliban’s military capability and states clearly that Pakistan’s Interservices Intelligence (ISI) is involved in supplying it.”

“Nato’s top brass: Pakistan aids Taliban”

October 7th, 2006 at 17:49:33



October 7th, 2006 at 20:31:02 From: Fallaci Admirer
Takes an army to change Pakistan
It takes an army to change Pakistan. Our army is in Iraq getting itself shot for nothing. Iran is in the way. Going through Iran on the way to Pakistan is the fastest and best route to get there. Also by the time we subdue Iran, Pakistan may get the message.

October 7th, 2006 at 22:13:56 From: Fallaci Admirer
Scott l
At the end of another thread, you said that Iran like Russia would fight us through proxies and that getting nukes doesn’t mean we won’t have conflict with them. The point of invading Iran is to fight them when we can defeat them now with low casualties. We decided not to fight Russia in 1945, and lost 50k+ in Korea and Vietnam each. Battle phase deaths in Iraq were 200, occupation deaths are 70. So if we leave Iraq and invade Iran we can avoid greater deaths later.

October 7th, 2006 at 22:15:42 From: Fallaci Admirer
reply to Piltdown
“We should have dealt with the Taliban long ago, and done it properly.” They are still a threat as is Pakistan. The levels of deaths we have in battle now are very low compared to wars past. When they catch up with us in technology this will pass. We need to defeat them now when its very low. This won’t last forever.

October 7th, 2006 at 22:19:32 From: Fallaci Admirer
reply to Gandhi
“But to state that Pakistan’s Interservices Intelligence (ISI) is involved is clearly speculation.” Frontline went to Pakistan and filmed the Taliban in the tribal regions. They have killed over 100 tribal elders. The head of NATO in Afghanistan is a Brit. The Brits are facing up to the reality of Pakistan because of Pakistan’s role in terrorism there and their much greater links and respect for India, something you, Gandhi, should appreciate. The Seymour Hersh New Yorker article on Kunduz airlift says that India’s RAW (their intel) monitored it. This was the Nov 2001 airlift of Pakistan generals and adviers to the Taliban out of the Afghan city of Kunduz. They were fighting us even after 9-11. Saudis give them money to fund the Taliban and they skim a percentage. They have 38 billion in foreign debt.

October 7th, 2006 at 22:24:58 From: Fallaci Admirer
Many of your points are well taken. But those emphasize why we need to denuke them and keep them from funding terrorism or immigrating here. We should realize Iraq was a failure. We also failed to set up a secular govt and abolish religious law and courts so that we were at least fighting for what we believe.

October 7th, 2006 at 22:28:03 From: Fallaci Admirer
You are right that fighting in Afghanistan is a losing proposition, like Iraq. We need to think in terms of raids instead of occupation. That is why we need to denuke Pakistan, and not waste our effort on Afghanistan that we can never win. Same with Iraq. Denuke Iran and Pakistan and leave.

October 7th, 2006 at 23:00:12 From: Fallaci Admirer
You are right, invading Iraq was a mistake. It was a Bush, PNAC obsession. When we were attacked on 9-11, they should have reoriented to Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and UAE. If they had done that, we might have gotten Iran to give up its nukes, or we could blow them over quickly like we did Iraq and can now.

October 7th, 2006 at 23:01:53 From: Fallaci Admirer
Not sure your point, but I think if Bush explains a real strategy to the American people they will support it. He can explain we had 200 battle phase deaths in Iraq and have 70 occupation deaths per month. So the logic is leave Iraq but denuke Iran while its easy. He can then say that lets us combine our armies together without spelling out the threate to Pakistan in public.

October 7th, 2006 at 23:20:01 From: Fallaci Admirer
“Put your money where your mouth is.” The point is we can lose a few lives now or more later. In Iraq we had 200 battle phase deaths and lose 70 deaths per month of occupation, which gains us nothing. We want to denuke Iran and Pakistan and stop the funding of terrorism by Saudi Arabia and UAE. So we should do exactly those things. That’s what the neocons want to do, but they think they have to lie to the American people instead of just say, this is our plan. They can do each part of it one at a time so as not to tip off the others, but each part makes sense. If they tell the American people we are leaving Iraq so the 70 deaths per month are over, but we have to denuke Iran by ground invasion and point out this cost only 200 deaths in Iraq, they have a plan to sell.

October 7th, 2006 at 23:21:31 From: Fallaci Admirer
Piltdown, Secular rulers gone
We have focused our efforts in the wrong direction in Iraq and Afghanistan, you are right. If we invade Iran, we will be taking out theocratic rulers. All rulers in that part of the world are unpopular. If you depose theocratic rulers, the people will support non theocratic ones, adn vice versa. So depose the theocrats in Iran and Saudi Arabia.

October 7th, 2006 at 23:34:39 From: Fallaci Admirer
Thank you

October 7th, 2006 at 23:36:08 From: Fallaci Admirer
re Dmaker
We Pakistanis and Saudis agree to what we ask but then do what they want. They both keep supporting terrorism. So we have to create change.

October 7th, 2006 at 23:45:01 From: Fallaci Admirer
The Pakistanis and Saudis agree to what we ask but then do what they want.

October 8th, 2006 at 09:19:24 From: Fallacie Admirer
Since Iran has no nukes, this is the time to keep them from getting them. North Korea is a problem as is Pakistan because they have nukes and spread missile and nuclear technology.

October 8th, 2006 at 09:24:36 From: Fallaci Admirer
reply to Scott l
“I will have to settle for the natural course of cultural evolution to get my wish. ” So in the meantime, we need to contain the violence that may come towards us. As you point out, their masses are programmed with extreme views towards us that include what we call suicide bombing, but which they call maryrdom. Until that view changes, we need to keep nukes out of their hands. How long is this? Arabia attacked the West in 633 AD. Its now 2006. The Middle East and Pakistan were more Western in the 1960’s than now. Thus the evolution has been towards extremism. Iran, UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan are all funding or supporting that movement. Changing the governments can stop that direction. They can’t start getting better until we stop their governments and rich sheiks from making it worse. Denuke them in the meantime.

October 8th, 2006 at 09:26:54 From: Fallaci Admirer
FA: The Pakistanis and Saudis agree to what we ask but then do what they want. “you mean what is good for the usa and conspirators???????? and for themselfs!!!” Its what we ask them to do and then they don’t do. We ask them to stop supporting terrorism and in reference to Scott l’s comments, to stop teaching hate of the West in their schools. Saudi textbooks have such ideas in them, and they spread those textbooks in other lands, even in the US and Europe.

October 8th, 2006 at 09:27:35 From: Fallaci Admirer
FA: The Pakistanis and Saudis agree to what we ask but then do what they want. “you mean what is good for the usa and conspirators???????? and for themselfs!!!” Its what we ask them to do and then they don’t do. We ask them to stop supporting terrorism and in reference to Scott l’s comments, to stop teaching hate of the West in their schools. Saudi textbooks have such ideas in them, and they spread those textbooks in other lands, even in the US and Europe.

October 8th, 2006 at 10:13:32 From: Fallaci Admirer
“Ask whether can America afford the losses that have been the only reward for her unstinting support for Isreal?” The attack on the West started in 633 and was against the Christian Eastern Roman Empire. The Pope quoted Manuel II from 1500 and indicated it was a brusque statement, and there have been death threats. In France, the police have had 2500 wounded in 2006 from going into the projects of immigrants. Women are raped routinely in Malvo Sweden for not wearing veils and the government covers it up. A car dealer in Ohio just got death threats for an ad about Discounts for Dhimmis. Its not limited to Isreal in space or time. It started in 633 and is almost global in scope. They attacked India in 1999 and said it was terrorists when it was Pakistan’s army. When the invaders reached India they killed millions, some estimate tens of millions.

October 8th, 2006 at 12:59:59 From: Fallaci Admirer
Reply Dmaker
The Western doctrine is not just a random doctrine that we have and others have one just as good. The West’s doctrine reflects the wisdom of the ancient world around the Mediterranean basis. This includes the ancient Middle East. The Ancient Greek city states were based on democracy and on free state on the sea. They learned from each other, debated, and advanced science, law, freedom, etc. That was partly preserved by the Eastern Roman Empire. The attack in 633 was an attack on the ancient laws of Babylon and the Middle East for trade, commerce, interest, etc. The idea is to not have to nuke the rest of the world later by acting now when battle phase deaths in Iraq were 200 v. occupation deaths of 70 per month. We can invade Iran, leave Iraq, cut our total deaths and help Iraq by cutting of the aid to the rebels from Iran. Thus invading Iran dominates staying in Iraq.

October 8th, 2006 at 14:29:16 From: Fallaci Admirer
Good link and point. “Gen. David Richards, a British officer who commands NATO’s 32,000 troops here, warned in an interview with The Associated Press that if life doesn’t get better over the winter, most Afghans could switch sides.” We need to take this to the source, Pakistan which is training them and Saudi Arabia and UAE that are funding them.

October 8th, 2006 at 14:29:48 From: Fallaci Admirer
We need to increase our army size, good point Tom3.

October 8th, 2006 at 14:57:17 From: Fallaci Admirer
So we agree on the diagnosis, that Pakistan is the source and that it seeks to harm the West. So the question is the remedy. Invading Iran lets us surround Pakistan. We can then exert pressure on it by sanctions and even blockade. We can bomb their nuclear processing plants to stop their producing more fuel. Nuclear weapons have to be touched up or they become inert. Without a source, they become inoperative.

October 8th, 2006 at 15:48:54 From: Fallaci Admirer
“So, tell me again Fascist Admirer, how are we going to invade Iran and Pakistan, when we are LOSING in Afghanistan and Iraq?” We are fighting wars on the periphery in Iraq and Afghanistan. Iran, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are funding or supporting those wars. That is why we must take the war to the source. Our main army is in Iraq. That army can leave Iraq and knock over Iran. Battle phase deaths in Iraq were 200, occupation deaths are 70 per month. We take out Iran and that positions us to surround Pakistan. We then offer them to give up their nukes or face sanctions and blockade and we hit their reactors so they can’t maintain their nukes, nukes decay over time and become inert.

October 8th, 2006 at 15:52:04 From: Fallacie Admirer
“Afghanis’ lives don’t improve”. Thus showing our current strategy isn’t working. Which is why going to the source can work. Defeating Iran will change perceptions in Pakistan of US capability. It also puts the army that defeats Iran on their border and unites the army in Iraq with the NATO army in Afghanistan. It gives direct supply from the sea through Iran to Afghanistan, so that we don’t depend on Pakistan. They have leverage on us because we don’t have a path from the sea to Afghanistan that doesn’t go through them. That will change their leverage, which will change their behavior.

October 8th, 2006 at 16:11:21 From: Fallacie Admirer
Reply to Gandhi
NATO is in Afghanistan to protect the West. Pakistan is intentionally undermining it by training the Taliban and supporting them with funds from Saudi Arabia that they take a cut of. Iran is supporting international terrorism and developing nukes. Pakistan developed its nuke in May 98 and then attacked India in 99 and in effect has attacked us through the Tablian and al Qaeda in Aug 98 embassies, 2000 Cole, 2001 WTC and Pentagon. Saudis are funding this. We have to go to the two sources Pakistan and Saudi Arabia or we will lose. They will fund and support rebels against us in Afghanistan and Iraq forever. Iran is part of this combination and it sees that like Pakistan, once it gets nukes, it can go on the offensive. So we need to attack them now when battle phase deaths are 200 v. occupation deaths per month in Iraq are 70. Deaths in Iran may be higher than in Iraq for the battle phase, but we are bleeding in Iraq and Afghanistan while our main opponents sit back in Pakistan, Iran and Saudi Arabia without being touched.

October 8th, 2006 at 16:14:27 From: Fallaci Admirer
To Tom3
Why do you want to let Pakistan and Saudi Arabia fund the deaths of Americans in Afghanistan and Iraq, and likely 9-11, the Cole and the embassy attacks? Why is your anger at the neocons but not at those who are the real source against us? Why do you want the Saudis to fund world wide terror and get away with it? Why let Pakistan fund the Taliban right now? 2 Pakistani generals were airlifted out of Kunduz in Nov 2001 according to Seymour Hersh. They have been fighting us the whole time. Doesn’t that mean anything to you?

October 8th, 2006 at 16:15:01 From: Fallaci Admirer
To Tom3
Why do you want to let Pakistan and Saudi Arabia fund the deaths of Americans in Afghanistan and Iraq, and likely 9-11, the Cole and the embassy attacks? Why is your anger at the neocons but not at those who are the real source against us? Why do you want the Saudis to fund world wide terror and get away with it? Why let Pakistan fund the Taliban right now? 2 Pakistani generals were airlifted out of Kunduz in Nov 2001 according to Seymour Hersh. They have been fighting us the whole time. Doesn’t that mean anything to you?

October 8th, 2006 at 17:37:29 From: Fallaci Admirer
Scott l
First, over the last half century they expropriated our oil contracts, leases, and more. “Historically the West has shown a greater propensity for aggression and domination than the Muslim world. ” The West has been subject to barbarian invasions from the East for millenia. The current immigration based version is the same as in millenia past. They attacked us in 1993 at WTC. That was intended to kill 250,000 people. They attacked us again and again. We took until 2001 to notice they were really at war with us. The Saudis are funding the Taliban against us now with Pakistan. Iran is funding terrorism like Hezbollah. You seem to be proposing surrender as the solution. The extremism came from the Muslim Brotherhood. Qutb came to America around 1950, had a bad reaction, and pushed modern extremism. Khomeini was pushing it in 1942. The Ottoman Empire was against us in WWI as part of the onslaught that started in 633 against the West. But your conclusion Scott is that we should surrender?

October 8th, 2006 at 17:53:11 From: Fallaci Admirer
Link on the relativism argument.

You can also look at jihadwatch.org for the latest atrocities and terrorism incidents.

October 8th, 2006 at 20:15:52 From: Fallaci Admirer
West Bank: Buy in Buy Out
I propose Buy in or Buy out for the West Bank. Buy in is cut all outside aid, and aid creates rage, and instead have them spend their time at work to support themselves. Now they are paid to resist. Those who don’t like buy in, can go for buy out, they get 750 dollars per year per person and the host country gets the same. Jordan, Syria, Egypt can be hosts. The money can come from the oil fields in Iraq and Iran.

October 8th, 2006 at 20:18:05 From: Fallaci Admirer
West and violence
It is true the West has had violence in its past, but it was attacked at WTC 93 and didn’t really respond until 8 years later after WTC 01 and Pentagon attacks. So the West is peaceful and is being set upon by the non peaceful.

October 9th, 2006 at 08:48:46 From: Fallaci Admirer
re Buy Out Move Out

It has a nice ring to it Scott, so the question is which group to buy out and move out. Economically it applies better to the Palestinians. Per capita income of Israelis is 20k or more, while on the West Bank, Jordan, Egypt, its 2k or less per year. There are approximately 6mm Palestinians and Israelis. So the buyout plan makes more sense for the Palestinians. Once they are gone, the per capita income of Israelis will likely rise by 10 percent or more, and security costs will fall, so that this pays for the buy out move out of the Palestinians.